Studies was basically analysed having fun with SPSS twenty-five.0. First descriptive analyses was basically did, and Cronbach’s alphas and you can frequencies. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess relationships between gender, decades, intimate direction, which have an enchanting/intimate lover, SNS made use of, sexting normalisation and you may desire to take part in sexting due to the fact separate parameters, as well as the four sexting habits as the dependent variables. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are regarded as a measure of effect proportions. The variables were joined toward model as well. The research was also stratified because of the sex.

Incidence out of sexting behaviors

The most typical sexting behaviors are receiving (21.2%) and receiving thru an intermediary (twenty-eight.4%), followed closely by third-group forwarding of intimate blogs (nine.3%) and you may, lastly, giving (8.1%). Descriptive analytics are provided during the Table 2.

Brand new regression patterns have been tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is .42 toward “sending” model, .30 towards the “receiving” design, .23 towards “third-cluster forwarding” design, and you will .17 on the “receiving through a mediator” model (Dining table step 3:

From the “sending” design, determination so you can sext (OR: 8.26; 95% believe period [CI]: 5.36-), which have a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), intimate direction (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-step three.00) and age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step ruso novias saliendo 1.step 14-step 1.63) had been somewhat about sending involvement. On the “receiving” model, that have an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: 3.dos7; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), determination to help you sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-step 3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step three.10), gender (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.6step one; 95% CI: 1.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: 1.20-step 1.86) and you can many years (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step one.step 12-step 1.41) was basically significantly connected with finding involvement.

From the “third-group forwarding” model, having fun with Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.16-six.51), determination to help you sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-dos.72), sex (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-dos.91), with an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step one.dos9-2.68), using Twitter (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: step one.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step one.09-step 1.87) and you may decades (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66) were rather connected with wedding into the third-class forwarding.

From the “getting through an intermediary” model, using Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step 1.5dos-dos.24), that have a romantic/sexual spouse (OR: 1.7step one; 95% CI: step 1.35-dos.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.4step one; 95% CI: step 1.step 1step one-step one.80) and many years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.23-step one.49) were notably connected with engagement within the receiving via an intermediary.

Sex variations

Brand new regression designs was basically tall. Nagelkerke’s R dos is .50 for women and you can .41 to own males with the “sending” model; .30 for women and you will .31 to own men for the “receiving” model; .18 for women and you may .24 getting men with the “third-party forwarding” model; and you will .14 for girls and you will .22 having males into the “getting through a mediator” model (Table 4:

On “sending” design, for women, determination so you’re able to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), that have an intimate/sexual lover (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you can ages (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-2.20) have been rather pertaining to giving involvement. Getting people, they certainly were readiness to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: step three.68-nine.94), which have a romantic/intimate companion (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and making use of Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).

About “receiving” model, for girls, determination in order to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), having a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-dos.33) and you will ages (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.step 17-step one.72) was somewhat connected with acquiring involvement. For people, they were having an enchanting/intimate lover (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step one.58-3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step one.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-1.86) and age (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step 1.38).